JEDDORE / OSAsk AI

04 · Innovation Lab

Lead Scoring Simulator

Change a hypothetical lead. A predictive model re-scores it instantly and shows which factors moved the number.

Illustrative: A demonstration on synthetic data. Not a real system or result.Synthetic weights that demonstrate the technique. This is not a reproduction of any proprietary or production model.

lead.inputsynthetic
Fit
Behaviour
Intent
93%chance to convert

Tier A · Route to sales now

Assign to the territory owner with a 1-hour response SLA and a pricing-ready task.

Typical lead: 13% · This lead: 7.4×

Why this scorevs. a typical lead
  • Requested pricing+1.35
  • Industry fit+0.75
  • Lead source+0.75
  • Timeline+0.55
  • Recency+0.36
  • Role+0.35
  • Site engagement+0.29
  • Company size+0.15
  • Email opens+0.02
  • Budget confirmed0

Values are log-odds. Green pushes the score up, amber pulls it down.

Activity-only score

34/100

Counts clicks and opens.

Predictive score

93/100

Weighs fit, intent and recency.

Quiet on activity, strong on fit and intent. Activity scoring would miss this one.

How it works

A logistic model

Each characteristic adds to or subtracts from the lead's log-odds of converting. The total passes through a sigmoid to become a probability. In production the weights are learned from won and lost history; here they are set by hand.

Explainable by design

Because the model is additive, every score breaks down into contributions. The bars compare this lead with a typical one, so a rep can see why it ranks where it does and challenge it if it looks wrong.

Scores drive action

A score only matters if it changes what happens next. Tiers map to routing rules: who gets the lead, how fast, and which nurture track it enters.

Why activity scoring fails

Points for clicks and email opens reward curiosity, not buying intent. A student researching the category can out-score a decision-maker who visited once and asked for pricing. Weighing fit and intent alongside behaviour fixes that; the comparison panel shows the difference.

What changes in a real deployment

Weights are trained on the CRM's own outcomes, validated on held-out data, monitored for drift, and written back to the CRM so routing and reporting use the same number. See the predictive scoring project.

Perspective

What brings you here?

Pick a perspective and the site reorders itself around what you care about. The facts don't change, only the emphasis. Change it any time from the top bar.

Evidence

  • Loading…